Funny that the original argument was always, where will they get the money to buy back shares and then in turn they pay off $380k in convertible debt with cash clearly showing they have the cash flow.
And the 250M is a number up to, meaning they can buy up to that amount if it makes sense to do so not that they will buy 250M, not sure why that is hard to understand, maybe they buy back 50M, maybe 100M its up to them as to what makes sense.
But people act like an O/S of 500M with a massive amount owned by insiders with float being closes to 250M is some how a bad share structure.