You can be right if that's what you are looking for. I was just stating that it would be nice to see more current Apple activity with LQMT/CIP rather than Glassimetal. And I gave the example.
I could give a subjective answer as to how injection molding and amorphous metal are related to this patent and that can be using in mass CE production but why!
Your comment "Apples most recent patents are written in generic enough form to use any amorphous material and the patents are assigned to Apple (not CIP or glassimetal). So there is no implication of any preferred choice specifically in any recent patents."
My comment "Apple actively issuing patents with Glassimetal is better than silence with LQMT. :( "
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
