Replies to post #168127 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Watts Watt]

Ah, but this is what has been DIRECTLY communicated to LQMT shareholders by Li himself. That counts.

Everything else said specific to comments made by or in Li's name DIRECTLY to Eontec shareholders is not a communication to LQMT shareholders.

If it were, all of these communications by Li to Eontec shareholders would be posted verbatim in English to the LQMT website.

Think about it.

Everything posted on this board about Eonted are NOT direct communications to LQMT shareholders about Liquidmetal. They are direct communications about Eontec to Eontec shareholders.

I am not aMAZEd by any of the Chinese to English translations about Eontec for the benefit of Eontec shareholders.

I am only moved about what Lugee as CEO of LQMT says to me, a LQMT shareholder, about LQMT making money for me. Not about Eontec making money for Eontec shareholders.

BIG EFFIN difference.

[Watts Watt]

Bottom line: the only evidence out there or anywhere that counts is the meat on my plate.

IHUB sizzle does not feed the shareholders.

THIS is the BOTTOM LINE.

And the sinking from 44 cents to 10 cents is the only evidence for the bottom line as well as the top line.

The bottom line doesn't really count when you don't even have a top line, now, does it?