Replies to post #62755 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[AllinFun]

Good example. It's really just about who will the weak be to give up their shares when Carter offers the buybacks in succession. He will offer the lowball get very few shares, bring his offer up and pick up a couple more and so on and so forth. But this is all assuming he offers a buyback. Offering a buyback alone shows high interest and for what reason other than an impending announcement that both sides have come to an agreement - and he is the one who ultimately can make that decision.

If we were confident in this case before then nothing as changed beside you can't sell for beer money or groceries so make sure you get that off the table now if needed - you also can't buy anymore so make sure your comfortable with your position in correlation to your expected ROI here. The bare minimum numbers cannot be any less than .20 unless the cable companies get all the patents thrown out in trial which is not at all likely considering the strength shown in the PTAB support we have vs companies like VHC who had no support from the PTAB and still have Apple by the balls.

[easyme]

If common shareholders were not protected, there would soon be no stock trading. Therefore, I expect you and others are correct. Otherwise, scammers would quickly destroy the market. In our case, insiders would be vulnerable to prosecution if those with lesser shares were 'ripped off'. In any case, I don't think Mr. Carter has intentions to cheat fellow shareholders. That does not compute. What transpires here is very public, and obvious. Court records every step of the way!

UOIP!