InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JRIII

02/13/19 10:32 PM

#214449 RE: Umibe5690 #214438

This post is a mess of contradictory statements, starting with the first two sentences. Not sure what you are saying here.

UPDATE: I see you corrected the first two sentences, but I am still having a hard time deciphering what you are trying to say. Don't dance around your conviction. Just say it.
icon url

sentiment_stocks

02/14/19 2:24 AM

#214471 RE: Umibe5690 #214438

The trial is unblinded. No one knows anything for certain until unblinding takes place. So why would they re-write the SAP and continue the trial even now while "progressing" toward data-lock?



I think you meant to write the trial is blinded; that’s why no one knows anything for certain. That’s why they are writing the SAP now... they can’t unblind the trial and then rewrite the SAP. That would be akin to saying, ahh, now that we see how everyone really did, let’s figure out a way to make the statistical formulas give us what we need to make them work. No, the time to rewrite them is while the trial is still in a hypothesis mode. That is while they can still state we think our treatment is going to do this, this and this... and they still don’t know if it really will do this, this and this.