What happens is the formal QM denies the interpretation. Deutsch et al. "philosophy of physics"... Dugic... phys phys.
However, there is something teeter/totter 2WI.
See also Susskind vs. Hawking re: information does not disconnect.
And put Mach's spinning bucket of water in the box with the cat, and why is it still spinning regardless of the state of the cat you check on later...
The whole entire problem imnsho is that space is not a geometric dimension, it is a collective behavior... the stringy guys are not entirely wrong... n-dimensional fuzz 'brane' i.e., entanglement with pointer swap of string ends. Is is "solid" due to the relative frequency. What do you do with all the c^2 when all you need is c... :)
Zeno nailed it with the Tortoise v. Hare issue. There is not a logic problem. There is a problem with the nature of what is space and how does it actually work. (hint: time only... drives the phys. guys mad) programmer way... :)