He was PAID! Plain and simple! By the same people who paid for five different lawsuits, none of which, mysteriously have yet to develop any further than just a filing.
>>He can always say that he was worried about his own exposure and was acting in good faith.
How exactly would Klaus be able to claim this? I am pretty puzzled as to how Klaus would be able to cover himself with a 'good faith' statement if he did in fact falsely declare a company to be bankrupt...
>>GTEM would not be able to touch him. Seems a perfect way to get even without taking any risk and at minimal expense.
Again, exactly how would GTEM not have any recourse over an EX-EMPLOYEE who falsified a filing. No risk to Bonn? I think you are having quite a hard time spinning either side of this development.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
