InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mtlebomac

02/01/19 3:41 PM

#209929 RE: brooklyn13 #209928

Agreed, probably hasn't even read the patent(s) — well, they are very esoteric and I've highlighted the areas of interest years ago — ...might even respond with TLDR (that's not a ticker admins - too long didn't read)
icon url

I_Am_Ram

02/01/19 4:19 PM

#209933 RE: brooklyn13 #209928

Lol I asked questions and you respond with “you don’t know what you’re talking about”

I’ve provided links backing up what I’ve said. What I’ve said comes from experience and multiple observations. Many here are first timers that know it all apparently.

As I said to somebody else, show me an example of what “longs” are saying is going to happen here in a similar case... I’ll wait.

icon url

I_Am_Ram

02/01/19 4:29 PM

#209937 RE: brooklyn13 #209928

Also, don’t point at 4% gains on elevated volume like it’s a good sign. It’s the OTC. 4% is nearly negligible and it’s gone down 4% on elevated volume just as much as it’s gone up. I have never claimed people are massively selling off right now if that’s what you’re trying to say.

I have said in the past two weeks leading up to the hearing, there have been many more sells than buys. I would say that is an indication that all you confident “longs” aren’t as confident as you try to present. If all of you really believed this would be a slam dunk and all really knew you have the litigation process pinned down, you would be sending this north of 2 pennies, maybe 3. Instead, here we sit going up and down between 0.0155 and 0.0180 on less than 40 million in volume in the last two weeks.