InvestorsHub Logo

biosectinvestor

02/01/19 4:10 PM

#211809 RE: beachhyena #211780

It was not a full halt, it was a partial halt. Clearly the FDA anticipated that meant the trial would continue with already enrolled patients. That’s a false assumption.

It was not because of safety of the treatment, and if it were, they’d have had a duty to warn.

biosectinvestor

02/01/19 4:15 PM

#211812 RE: beachhyena #211780

In other words, it was not the FDA’s intention that they stop the trial or treatments at all, clearly. If that had been the intention, we’d have known and NWBO would have had no other options but to stop, but for extenuating circumstances.... and those would have been communicated clearly built the regulators for the benefit of the patients with whom the FDA has the firmest of duties.

dude409

02/01/19 4:17 PM

#211813 RE: beachhyena #211780

beach, good post that pretty much sums up my thinking about the situation.
Home Run......

Etienne1

02/01/19 6:35 PM

#211873 RE: beachhyena #211780

Great post beachhyena!