I also found her letter very easy to read and absorb. She is a professional and writes as such to another professional so that every word is important. Let's see if she receives a response. Should be very telling. A "no response" based on the perponderous of factual.information would be disheartening at best. We know how corrupt the legal system is. Let's see if we were really joined at the hip with the HFs or if their motive was to jettison retail from the getgo. I have mucho confidence in BOP. This was the time to question the court. It would be refreshing if we had a positive response from the UST.
A typical legal writing is such as the countless of filings that COOP and other public companies made, as well as Chad Smith reply letter. You may not agree with him but it is concise and to the point.
And our EC distinguished members of the past wrote very well and clearly.