Not totally true. Yes, I do think they could keep bailing the water out with a plan B, until we get a plan C in action, but the costs will be so excessive that it will make it much harder for this company to become a decent investment for any of us within the next year or three. And the potential of out right failure is increased another fifty fold or so. I do not like increasing my risks that much in an already risky investment. I also like to make money on my inestment within a year or so rather than continue to watch them struggle. How much more time do you wish to add to your investment time frame for this to start turning into a profitable investment, dlewis? How much more at risk do you want to put it at with increased potential for total loss of your invested monies?
I would like to reduce my risk, (Albeit, 400MM increase in AS does increase the risk quite a bit also), and shorten the time frame it takes for my investment to make money rather than lose money (400MM AS does increase this time frame a bit also). Only way to lower the risk and reduce the time frame right now is to trust the managment, (managment that is demanding trust with a red hot fire poker held two inches from our eye rather than earning the trust first, which ironically is the first indication that we CANNOT trust them) and vote YES.