InvestorsHub Logo

hotmeat

01/28/19 12:11 PM

#556650 RE: David West #556640

Just got through reading the questions asked and the reply received. Other than the issue of the WMILT not being responsible for any possible future distributions outside the current assets, he just muddied the waters even more. IMO much of what he responded to was overshadowed by what he clearly avoided directly responding to. I admit it seems that I was totally wrong about the WMILT being the recipient of possible legacy assets. Seems though that ""some"" here have a short memory regarding their own past deficiencies in predicting this case.

Olti100

01/28/19 12:22 PM

#556654 RE: David West #556640

Thats why is so shamefull the length that the Audit being made from Ernest and Young is taking so long on the Value of the Disclosed WAND Company Sub of the WMIH and now COOP.So why no one wants to talk about the value of WAND?

BBANBOB

01/28/19 12:28 PM

#556657 RE: David West #556640

David

"" Bankruptcy Court" pretty much spell sit out imho doesn't it to you????

Ask Justin Nelson about bringing up assets HELD OUTSIDE of the BK case and see what he tells ya!!!!!!!!!!!.

Or in other words HOW DID THAT WORK OUT FOR HIM in the BK case?