Your post illustrates the MPD demonstrated by exuberant SHMP investors. You say the commodity is the tech, not the shrimp. Fine. The Harbinger report, which exuberant investors like to tout, has a valuation that is STRICTLY BASED ON SELLING SHRIMP. Take that out of the Harbinger report and you don't have a quantitative valuation.
So what school of thought do you follow? Is the patent worth some small percentage of some global shrimp industry? Is it based on what a 50,000 sq.ft. facility with 24 tanks raising X lb of shrimp every Y weeks can expect to pay for the tech and still be profitable for the owners?
So let's see your analysis.
Me? I don't have a clue how much the patent or licensing are worth. I don't even know how much shrimp SHMP can raise (and in what sizes) in 26 weeks from a 6000 gallon tank. No investor does and the people that do have that answer ain't talking...yet.
I've got my profits from waiting for the bottom. And I'm looking to take more. If it never gets to "dollarland", I'll be still be happy. Why? because SHMP is a "story" stock with a few more pages to be written and hopefully a few more opportunities for profit-taking.
Unfortunately, the "author" of this "story" is looking more like George R R Martin than Mickey Spillane.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
