Replies to post #495748 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[cooler_heads]

Taken from another board.

Credit-cherzeca

“I believe it would be a violation of the judicial oath for collins en banc to find fhfa constitutionally structured. the judicial power under article III extends to "cases and controversies", and collins is a controversy in which no party is seeking a decision that fhfa is constitutionally structured...only amici are asking for that...and amici are not parties to the case and controversy before collins en banc. Ps still have to win on standing and redressability, and get awarded retrospective relief (void NWS). but Ps cannot lose on whether fhfa is unconstitutionally structured.”

[Pecker9Wood]

This letter and the arguments are perfectly fine. As far as agendas we will see, but my money is on the normal completion of the conservatorship. I have a good seat for the show.

[Donotunderstand]

How and why are they crooks ?

How about Mnuchin for two years ?


Is everyone opposed to you a crook and everyone who agrees a hero?

[Embers]

Question on Judicial Panel for En Banc.

I am long FNMA and FMCC.

Lawsuits have had a hard time in the courts.

Are you saying that the Judges for En Banc are conservative and are more likely to provide a decision in our favor?

Do you have any background on this you can provide?

I agree that a bunch of Democrats signing a brief is suspect. And one that denies the separation of powers (as I see it) also is highly suspect.

Government in bed with Government to give money to Government has to leave a bad taste even in the mouth of Judges.