InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hankmanhub

01/21/19 3:22 PM

#209335 RE: IkeEsq #209333

Ike, I think you are wasting your time with this question. It is being addressed to the wrong party. NWBO does not police nor enforce insider trading regulations. That is the job of the SEC and law enforcement.
icon url

Doc logic

01/21/19 3:53 PM

#209337 RE: IkeEsq #209333

IkeEsq,

I like your alternate a little better as it allows for a little more wiggle room for discussion. As to the comment by the other poster, I agree NWBO is not the enforcement agent but NWBO has knowledge of what this situation involves including applicable laws.
Comment on this situation is warranted as it is extremely important to investor understanding of investment risk, past and present actions being taken and potential rewards from leverage gained during any future or perhaps ongoing negotiations regarding resolution of this matter. No need to respond and thank you for all your efforts. Best wishes.
icon url

sentiment_stocks

01/21/19 6:03 PM

#209359 RE: IkeEsq #209333

I like your alternate better too.

I originally wanted the Woodford question asked, then I waffled on it, but I think it would be good to know if they have "evidence" of it, so I'm back to wanting the question to be asked.

Thanks Ike!
icon url

Horseb4CarT

01/21/19 6:25 PM

#209367 RE: IkeEsq #209333

Ike, if I were LP I wouldn’t touch that question if for no other reason than it is controversial in nature and a no win position. Not that we shareholders should be kept in the dark, however discretion is the better part of valor, so to speak.