InvestorsHub Logo

LuckyPanda

01/16/19 4:42 PM

#555295 RE: hotmeat #555292

You just answered the question. How could we have signed 75/25 for bankruptcy remote assets that the court could not have considered? Our releases were only based on what was available to the court at the time of signing...would not include bankruptcy remote assets.

We could not have signed releases for 75/25 "hypothetical" bankruptcy remote assets just as you say the court cannot answer the 75/25 question to "hypothetical" assets.

PickStocks

01/16/19 7:58 PM

#555316 RE: hotmeat #555292

They were not hypothetical, suckman lawyers could not get them to respond because if they did it would have been a different story