InvestorsHub Logo

Narbooty1

01/12/19 2:57 PM

#66386 RE: LongShot_Louie #66380

Now this is a correct statement. Yes. The issue is that it is highly doubtful that all of these companies listed have patents that are considered vital or directly incorporated as part of these 5 patents in question that mention SFIO.

"Additional manufacturers, designers, and/or assignees of components and related technologies that may be employed in aerosol delivery device include"

The above does not necessarily imply that your statement will be relevant for SFIO. I can not say with any authority that it will not hold true for at least one of them though. We do not, however, have any evidence that it will...other than it was unlocked. And the fact that it was unlocked is circumstantial. Time will tell.

I suspect that most of those screaming "THEY HAVE 5 PATENTS!!!" are simply the new wishful thinking bagholders. I feel for them.

cjstocksup

01/12/19 7:11 PM

#66407 RE: LongShot_Louie #66380

They sold it to RJR now RAI! Look at the patent info and ask Janice Shell she will gladly give you the DD.

does own patent # 08738110.9 (at least no one has presented any evidence to the contrary) and patent # 08738110.9 predates, i.e. represents "prior art", for all of the others. I believe that means the others are virtually worthless without access in some form to the SFIO patent if that technology is incorporated into the product, but I am waiting for a patent attorney to confirm or clarify that.