InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sentiment_stocks

01/06/19 12:51 PM

#206875 RE: Poor Man - #206776

The biggest risk outside the trial results itself is political risk: that either a large pharma or investor with political connections would undermines the company at the FDA level, which seemed to be happening during the last election cycle when Les was complaining about how difficult it had become to deal with the staff at the FDA.



If you think that big Pharma or an investor with political connections could undermine NWBO with the FDA (based partially on something Les stated), then why is it such a stretch to think Big Pharma or an investor(s) with big pockets could also undermine NWBO by naked shorting them to death (based also partially on something Les has stated).

I don’t think FINRA, a private company overseen by those who are also capable of naked shorting, is the only source one can go to or use in order to determine if one’s stock is being naked shorted. I believe there are multiple ways of checking this, by following the tape, if you will, but I think maybe it has to be done in real time. The company has likely done this, if they are claiming numbers like 150 to 200 million shares have been naked shorted. In other words, they should have the proof.