First of all, I don't think that's the case that. " sharehareholders are saddled with the primary responsibility to promote and generate public awareness of BIEL's products." Who is the doing the " saddling ? " is it company policy ? It may seem like it's the case to some maybe and of course these are rhetorical questions. I think we all can agree for a variety of reasons BIEL was hamstrung and didn't have money to budget for advertising. With the settlement of the SEC case, I look for revenues to now be allocated toward advertising for public and professional awareness domestically. We are already seeing the fruits of BIEL's strategic International marketing partneriships with TV advertising in many different countries in many different languages around the globe. $BIEL$$$
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
