InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

JoshTaeger

12/18/18 12:56 PM

#8821 RE: thermal164 #8793

No, 4 more weeks to get what they projected. SHMP projected 24 weeks to get 18/20. Apparently, they didn't reach that size in 24 weeks due to density due to lack of mortality. I believe SHMP was touting 90%+ from the get-go.

It's great that SHMP's mortality is so low, but the question remains: why not declare victory now? Radio silence is not helping the pps.
icon url

thermal164

12/18/18 1:06 PM

#8828 RE: thermal164 #8793

Pretty sure if you read my post it stated 28 weeks (that included the extended time period, 24 weeks plus 4 weeks) and originally the company expected around 50% survival rate. SOOOOOO, once again, 28 weeks for 40% more product sounds great to me!!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$