InvestorsHub Logo

TTommy

12/11/18 8:12 AM

#46658 RE: Giovanni #46652

GM GIO. Apparently it is important for XXII ihub/forum members to not utilize CAPS. I received a post from one of the site mods to refrain from using caps!!!

I was wondering if anyone else posting received a message stating same. One would think that conveying info regarding the past, present, and possible future of XXII was more important.

go figure??? Yet some believe every word of posts regardless of the authenticity of the XXII material posted. Some have been absolutely bogus and are mere distractions with timelines that have not occurred to date. Maybe there should be more attention directed there than use of caps??? Just a thought of what the definition of lame really is?

This ihub xxii forum member believes that
corporate XXII is not being aggressive in promoting all of XXII'S intellectual I/P portfolio. Wasting time. effort, and capital are not considered to be good stewards of a public trust.

brooklyn13

12/11/18 9:01 AM

#46659 RE: Giovanni #46652

It also comes after countless hours of testimony by sick people describing how medical MJ has alleviated their symptoms, from the after effects of chemo to simple headaches and insomnia.

I'm not sure he's a clown, but it's very hard to understand his goals. Sure, he claims to be totally against "high nicotine" ciggies, but he used to be on the board of an e-cig company.

Has he come to see the light? Or is he in place to make sure that any transition away from traditional conveyors of nicotine goes smoothly for big tobacco?

I can't see a mandate. I see the FDA allowing VLN to compete in the open marketplace and I see big tobacco's plan to crush the fledgling challenger to their revenue. There is no other reason whatsoever that would explain why XXII's nicotine IP hasn't been bought for what amounts to pocket change. Unless it's that BT can beat back the FDA and VLN will not be approved.

There's a fair amount of pumping going on around here and that's to be expected. But the facts on the ground do not support an unalloyed rosy view of the future of XXII, especially with a marketing group that seems not to exist.

It's possible that various tobacco companies view the decline in share prices as normal fluctuations in a turbulent market, especially in the context of a longer term chart. If their shareholders find the future so obvious, as some here assert, why haven't they been pouring into XXII?