You posted this yesterday and I questioned "*The technical superiority. Despite the '10 million lines' claim, it appears that similar interactive features as well as analytical features are fairly easily duplicated using open source javascript. This threatens the advantage of being first to market. The man hours normally required for 10 million lines far exceeds the known resources NFUSZ has put into the company in the last couple of years, so it is possibly an 'amplified' number" I appreciate you showed me you had previously posted some data on how long it takes to program xxx lines of code and how in your opinion Rory's claim was not possible. Regarding the ease of duplicating the interactive video, you did point out to me you did not know if your thesis was correct as this is cloud based...but you are leaving that out of your post today. Regarding the first point, you are making a claim that Rory "may have" possibly misled investors with his 10 million lines of code claim. If I remember correctly you had personal discussion with Rory after the first time you claimed you could replicate the interactivity with 1,000 lines of code and came back to the forum with a retraction. Did you not ask Rory him about the 10 million lines claim??? If not why don't you now. You are implying he may have committed fraud. I do not believe Rory is that naive.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
