InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chinatown1980

12/02/18 8:04 PM

#201753 RE: Umibe5690 #201752

Great post! Something I would add. What other treatments have the surviving patients received? How many tried other treatments when they progressed in the trial? You want to talk confounded data, let's throw in a mix of other treatments into the bag, shake it up a little, then dump it out and compare everything to historical data if the trial endpoints are not stat sig. Sound good FDA? Maybe I'm wrong but it sure seems that is a valid question/risk with the way this trial was conducted. Anyone who thinks this is a lock has their head in their sand. There's only one thing for certain with this stock. More dilution and more stay tuned. Maybe we get a R/S for Christmas.
icon url

martyDg

12/02/18 8:13 PM

#201754 RE: Umibe5690 #201752

Multi-month process to completion was a very unclear timeline specially if you can use 12 month, 24, 36 so on and so forth. What I understand that she clearly states that it will be more than just few months.
icon url

JRIII

12/02/18 8:32 PM

#201759 RE: Umibe5690 #201752

Careful with that cautionary stuff, Umibe5690. They don't like that around here, not one bit. It's way more relevant to post rumors found on penny-stock Twitter pump accounts, and relay anecdotes about how a doctor friend once thought DCVax could never work, but now he works for a BP and is all-in on NWBO. That's the real world to some folks. Never mind facts. Never mind that we literally have been hearing the same claims about data lock, unblinding, and big pharma buyouts for years! Yes years, and never once have these prognostications been correct. Not once. But now it's different, and glory days are imminent.

After being told that August was the month, and then that October was the month, we were told repeatedly that November had to be the month. We were told the company had no choice but to unblind in November.

We were told that they were out of money and wouldn't be able to sustain operations, and that there was simply no benefit in keeping this trial going any further, so November had to be the month. We were told they already were well into the "processes" that Linda laid out in her press release (the same processes she now says haven't even begun). We were told that everything lined up for a submission to NICE with approval imminent. We were even shown the documents to prove that the NICE submission was under way! Funny how quickly the NICE bandwagon of misinformation was abandoned.

Finally, we were told that if nothing happened in November, there would be shareholder revolt and the stock price would plummet to single pennies. But that didn't happen. In fact, nothing happened, just like nothing we are told regarding NWBO ever happens. Yeah, I know, there was more of that blinded, blended, interim data presented by the company's lead researcher. Some people think that blinded, blended, incomplete data is as good as FDA approval. I don't think so, and neither does the market. Meanwhile, the only thing we've heard from the company is an incredibly vague and half-hearted statement following the release of this interim data that yes, it may be time to start the process of unblinding – soon, we think – and it probably will take another year before we have anything that we could even hypothetically consider presenting to the FDA. Oh, and they also released a fake delayed 10-Q announcement intended to convince everyone a deal is imminent.

It worked, and the charade continues, on and on and on.

Yeah, I know, this time it's different. I'll see. They'll show me and all the other shorts! Ok, but I'm not a short. I'm a long and I don't believe a g-dam word this company says – ever. They are enriching themselves at our expense, and it is wrong.
icon url

sukus

12/02/18 9:52 PM

#201778 RE: Umibe5690 #201752

What happens? It is supposed to be the jolliest time of the year. Too many question marks in the first paragraph.
icon url

longfellow95

12/03/18 5:18 AM

#201813 RE: Umibe5690 #201752

Why does everyone talk about Sawston, as if selling Sawston is a 'good thing' and inevitable.

It would be folly to sell Sawston.

The only rider to that is that it may become involved in a related party transaction. For example, Cognate buy into Sawston.

Selling to the highest bidder who may be a competitor, when you will desperately those manufacturing resources upon approval, is just plain crazy.