Replies to post #290351 on Forwardly Inc (FORW)

[waterchaser]

No shit! Why is Sharp teaming up with scammer Schaefer?
Sharp = Hero to Zero IMO.

[FEARANDGREED]

Looks pretty CLEAN to me...

why wouldn't he get a clean SEC reporting shell

This (below) is good enough for me.


Is a Pink Current Issuer “Fully Reporting” Under Rule 144?...
Yes, even though Pink Sheets are not “SEC reporting” a Pink Current Issuer on OTCMarkets.com can be considered “fully reporting” under Rule 144.
http://144letters.net/is-a-pink-current-issuer-fully-reporting-under-rule-144/
One of the important elements of SEC Rule 144 is the “current public information” requirement. Sometimes investors believe incorrectly that an Issuer needs to be an SEC Reporting company that is current in its 10-Q, 10-K and 8-K filings to be considered “fully reporting” under Rule 144.

Im pretty satisfied with the George Sharp procurements listed below...


First: Lowers Authorized Shares by 3 Billion ++
https://www.nvsos.gov/sosentitysearch/corpActions.aspx?lx8nvq=tFBMiZuw0wZPS0VpjjUDwg%253d%253d&CorpName=GUARD+DOG%2c+INC.


Then: Lowers them even more:

Guard Dog, Inc. Repatriates Over 6% of Its Outstanding Shares; Returns Them to Treasury
http://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/10/22/1624760/0/en/Guard-Dog-Inc-Repatriates-Over-6-of-Its-Outstanding-Shares-Returns-Them-to-Treasury.html
Mr. Sharp stated, “Our forensic audit of past share issuances revealed that 150 million shares were improperly issued for no value received. At our urging, the holder graciously return the shares and they have now been cancelled. We continue to internally investigate past issuances and hope to see a further reduction in the number of shares outstanding soon.”


And Now: Here is where we are
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GRDO/disclosure




I'm pretty sure that Im going to trust George Sharp's word above yours:
http://www.clippercorporatepartners.com/p/service-to-public-companies.html

[DIVEROTC1]

Good point.