So, assuming that the 86.4% is correct, that would be 286 patients. Now, if the current slide indicates "over 90%" (for the first time, I believe), then this would be at least 298 patients. Thus, an increase of at least 12 patients that have crossed between the Spring 2017 refresh, and the currently reflected data ... supposedly current through November 2018.
For the folks on this MB that are keeping track of such patient counts .... does this seem reasonable to have expected that many additional patients to cross over?