InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Whalatane

11/17/18 9:38 AM

#160382 RE: IgnoranceIsBliss #160375

Tasty. Thx for the DD
Kiwi
icon url

venus537

11/17/18 10:14 AM

#160398 RE: IgnoranceIsBliss #160375

"I'm not sure what to root for. A trial stoppage for futility would remove AZN's motivation to slow Vascepa approval, but it would also add fire to the nitwits who want to say Omega-3's don't work."

I'm rooting for a stoppage as it would clarify the difference between Vascepa (pure EPA) and other Omega-3's that don't seem to work.
icon url

ziploc_1

11/17/18 10:15 AM

#160399 RE: IgnoranceIsBliss #160375

Tasty: QUOTE A trial stoppage for futility would remove AZN's motivation to slow Vascepa approval, but it would also add fire to the nitwits who want to say Omega-3's don't work."


AZN embarked on the Strength trial IMO to save face over the mistake they made when they bought Omthera for 440 million dollars. The drug they acquired in this deal is really just prescription fish oil.... and Epanova at 4 grams a day has just too much DHA, which raises LDL too much to be safe ....every one knows by now that fish oils don't work and the results of the Strength trial should come as no surprise.
icon url

Jt0082

11/17/18 10:27 AM

#160407 RE: IgnoranceIsBliss #160375

One thing to note in STRENGTH is they enrolled an even higher risk of patient than REDUCE-IT - in fact, on average if you compare to REDUCE-IT >180mg/dl or something from memory, these stratified patients just showed something like 40% drop in death in R-IT. Bodes well for AZN that they enrolled such high risk group. Although I still think free fatty acid form will cause more GI side effects and enrolment is going to be much more difficult now... but that being said it will likely show some efficacy. Base case is not futility imo.
icon url

AVII77

11/17/18 11:35 AM

#160434 RE: IgnoranceIsBliss #160375

I understand efficacy boundaries because they are simpler, but I'm too dumb to understand the other side -- this is another reason I need AVII for this.



You don't need me Tasty, you got this.

The reason you think you don't "understand" the futility boundaries is not because they are too complex; it is because they are too variable from trial to trial.

But here's a <cough> "example" futility scenario for a <cough> "imaginary" 13,000 patient Cardiac outcome trial targeting <cough> 1600 events with <cough> both 50% and 75% interims planned.