InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Investor2014

11/07/18 3:00 PM

#171262 RE: dia76ca #171261

Yes a valid argument could be made quite adequately based on the 148 week data. We shall see...

I am just really worried that we might not have bio checked things quite to the standards of the upper echelon of biotech investors- they are very smart you know.
icon url

BIOChecker4

11/07/18 3:46 PM

#171268 RE: dia76ca #171261

In my opinion, A2-73 data does not meet the threshold for early approval. Obviously, it will be up to regulators to make this determination, not message board posters with vested interests.
icon url

Jonjones325

11/07/18 4:35 PM

#171276 RE: dia76ca #171261

Agreed. Why not go for it? The worse that could happen is they say no. Definitely worth a shot. The ADL scores along with the anecdotal improvements along with Macfarlane’s comments seem to suggest that it’s a path worth pursuing.

Hence, no registration. Yet