InvestorsHub Logo

Al4door

11/02/18 2:01 PM

#154204 RE: rfj1862 #154203

It always seems th amount of disinformation is close to the amount of accurate and pertinent information purposely making it harder for idiots like myself to decipher, case in point this important point about the NEJM, how can these two posters be so far apart , one would think it can be easily proven which to be right.....so I look forward to hearing the truth but until then I believe from just common sense that the NEJM would publish anything of important significance at any time...who wouldn't and polices are always tailored for such occasions imho.
GO AMRN!

Edited to add the pps is holding up well the day after a great day and during a red day in the market. Says a lot about AMRN i.e. more buyers want in.

sts66

11/02/18 4:18 PM

#154257 RE: rfj1862 #154203

There's a big difference between what's presented at a "major meeting" and what can be contained in a NEJM article - AMRN only has something like 10-12 mins to present, no way they can get into all of the TEs and subgroups in that amount of time. Dunno if you've ever done a presentation like this, but I have (in a different sector), and time flies by so fast you can end up rushing through the last few slides - there's a dude with a timer sitting near you giving you "2 mins left", "1 mins left", then "time is over, STFU" - even practicing and doing dry runs doesn't 100% prepare you for the actual presentation. Not going to do the legwork for you, but go to the NEJM website and look as the rules for what they require for papers to be accepted for publication - having new data never presented before is one of them - doesn't matter if the PE and SEs have been briefly mentioned at the AHA, new unreleased details is all they need. I think there's a 3 min Q&A session after the AHA gig, and I expect them to say "we will disclose the answer to that question in an upcoming research paper" to anything not presented.