Replies to post #159423 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[The Paraclete]

I have, on multiple occasions, presented a counter argument. And it comes from LQMT’s COO and from their website. You just disregard what I’ve said because you don’t want to believe it. And that’s OK. It does not say anything negative about you. But it’s not accurate to say there have been no counter arguments. And of the two arguments, I’m basing mine on what LQMT is telling it’s customers and it’s shareholders. What Josh is telling you is not based on the primary source.

[handsomehank]

Most would agree with part of your statement regarding LL’s structuring of JV’s in China for the creation of a large scale CE manufacturing network. However NO ONE has yet to show verifiable or credible information/facts that any revenue created by this network will flow to LQMT USA or any entity other than Eontec and their network partners. We would all HOPE for this not to be the case but until it either shows up on the books or we are told otherwise by LL we only have what LQMT has shared with the public, the rest is all unicorns, rainbows and pig scraps. I firmly believe LL’s promise of getting us back on Nasdaq will happen but that is 2-4 years down the road and far too long for the PATIENCE of most around here. IMHO

[PatentGuy1]

“Li has 410 million reasons to see that Liquidmetal benefits from this large scale manufacturing as products make their way to NA and Europe!”

You have frequently cited “410 million reasons” as if that carries some logical weight. If the was a 10:1 stock split, would “4.1 billion reasons” carry further weight with you.