Replies to post #46018 on Digital Utilities Ventures Inc (DUTV)

[SUNYN75]

The Caveat is "Executive Regulation through "BIA" (Bureau of Indian Affairs)

Tribal governments have significant leeway, as semi-autonomous political entities, in deviating from state law (e.g. Indian gaming). They are ultimately subject to supervisory oversight by the United States Congress[18] (The Indian Reorganization Act) and executive regulation through the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The nature and legitimacy of those relationships continue to be a matter of dispute.[22] ( "Indian Country Diaries . History")

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakota_people#cite_ref-22

FWIW, anyone have documentation that "Hemp" is grown on "TRIBAL LANDS" (ie.... Federal LANDS) ????????

Regards

Sunny:>)))

[Jeff69210]

Was Sessions referring to marijuana or hemp when he made this comment?

[cashclan]

Yes




In my reasoning. Changing the business model of a Venture on investor's is and of itself to me is a problem, unless those assets have been acquired that were involved and will be transferred to a new body.

The question for me is 5% of TORQ now 5% of DUTV or 350,000,000 shares or 250,000,000 at the time the DUTV SS was 5 Billion.

Also how many shares are involved in the -1,000,000 DUTV -7,000 PTEL dealing. Appears I received "1" delivered ENTI cert share for that and 3 are still MIA.

My account was also involved in a Market Fail to Deliver. So in April of 2017 I was made to sign a Money Market agreement to access that account. Those shares are Held by Ally. Ally is a Financial Institution as such under Dodd/Frank they have 2 years to divest in high risk securities or Ventures. The threshold on pps is $2.

There is 5 months left, best I can tell to either divest or reach $2 on those securities