InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Amatuer17

10/20/18 8:43 PM

#169054 RE: Doc328 #169047

Well - you did more precise timeline and I tend to agree.
Be ready to get a backlash for pushing trial end to 2020-2021 and how you are impacting the suffering girls.
icon url

Talon38

10/20/18 10:50 PM

#169064 RE: Doc328 #169047

Doc.....you have been intimately involved with previous trials so I trust your analysis of the timeline of the RS trial. However, as we discussed sometime back, I think your timeline is somewhat conservative. Given the close relationship of the patients' families with the RS Foundation, the data from the Natural History Study, the dedicated Rett Syndrome Centers of Excellence and their experienced staffs, the administrative aspects of the trial should move expeditiously. On the regulative side, if the FDA uses the modern precision medicine model of seamless and adaptive trials, imho your more conservative timeline could be considerably accelerated. With notable improvement in the quality of life of the RS girls along with a good safety record, there will be powerful advocacy from parents and worldwide RS organizations to get 2-73 to market. We must remember this a very debilitating disease which affects these girls and their families from birth to death which can be over four decades......much longer than the average Alzheimer's patient.
icon url

avxl_going_long

10/20/18 11:42 PM

#169066 RE: Doc328 #169047

Doc328, the PR says FDA approved Phase 2...why are you and others here saying this is a Phase 1 trial?
icon url

nidan7500

10/21/18 8:43 AM

#169073 RE: Doc328 #169047

Doc328...question.
First, thanks for your contributions here over time.
What impact do you think any positive results from initial testing/screening will have on timing?
Is the system capable of adapting to positive (read effective) responses from first testing? At present these kids do not have a chance. Do we expect everyone to calming standby if first kids start to recover some key function?

I sure don't.