InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

d0lphint0m

10/13/18 8:04 PM

#29582 RE: newrunner #29579

I do not discard the theory of Paulson investors selling shares to own free warrants and free up money to do it again. It has proven to be the best ROI to date. I do not like it, if it is happening, but I certainly can not blame them. No debate SOMETHING has driven the price down after each Paulson raise.
That said, I found the naked short report intriguing but only wish I was more optimistic in them forcing their hand, if true.
icon url

finesand

10/13/18 8:06 PM

#29583 RE: newrunner #29579

newrunner- you can call me a frustrated long on a so far failed opportunity

not shorting here or anywhere, just pushing out my mind 1:1
my main frustration as emphasized is the lack of funding for the whole operation and the horrible financials of course.

HOWEVER, I don't want to be arrogant and neglecting even the smallest probability of such a case - Do the name change then.

I have seen many bounces on such thing, latest was Honig's SkinTE company :)
OK, let's be serious - in such case it wouldn't be just a dead cat bounce, but a true VOW style squeeze (Porsche ..).

Wouldn't you believe in such case this is known to the insiders and they would load the boat or would have participated in last offerings?

Undecided overall w/ CYDY for now, still big fan of PRO 140 though. I really like this mAb. Would consider to participate in a proper secondary over $100M to resolve the whole funding issue.