InvestorsHub Logo

mcgbyron

10/12/18 6:25 PM

#211385 RE: Amac1001 #211380

Uh uh pick me pick me! I know this one.

Cause I did not think ANDI wants to Kim Kardashian this one in tweetsville !

janice shell

10/13/18 9:50 PM

#211609 RE: Amac1001 #211380

Burden of proof here is solely on ANDI not on ACI. From prior Utopya tweets we know that they know ACI exists. It’s on them to refute if this is false. If false why would they not do a simple tweet to refute it.

Exactly.

trader59

10/13/18 10:07 PM

#211612 RE: Amac1001 #211380

After tweeting that they looked forward to working with them, it's kinda hard to just out and out refute, isn't it?

ACI smelled of pump from day 1. If you look at the tweets about the phones, their "testing," the pictures of boxes, and the timing of the whole thing, you'd have to conclude a PPS increase was expected. When it didn't happen, the exit strategy was implemented, much as was done for Wewi. That revelation appeared a day or two ahead of another ugly financial report, got, what, a day or two of a modest increase until the financial report showed the lack of progress on making phones and more shares sold into the float.

The ACI thing went on for too long for it to not be someone who wanted/expected some positive price action for the stock, be that someone directly affiliated with the stock or not.