Replies to post #17315 on The Rising Influence of Rising Affluence

[wow_happens28]

Surprise, surprise, not, lol

[jbog]

(Bloomberg) -- The lawyer most responsible for winning a $289 million verdict against Bayer AG may end up wiping it out.

Brent Wisner was the lead trial attorney who in August convinced a jury that Monsanto Co.’s Roundup weed killer caused his client’s cancer. His compelling arguments and marshaling of evidence resulted in a blockbuster verdict that has spooked investors looking ahead to thousands of similar lawsuits across the U.S. pending against Monsanto, which Bayer acquired in June.

But Wisner’s closing arguments at trial irked the judge handling the case so profoundly that she’s considering tossing the verdict and ordering a new trial. The lawyer told jurors that Monsanto executives in a company board room were "waiting for the phone to ring" and that "behind them is a bunch of champagne on ice," according to a court filing. He said that “if the damages number isn’t significant enough, champagne corks will pop.”

At a hearing Wednesday, San Francisco Judge Suzanne Ramos Bolanos cited a number of reasons why she’s inclined to set aside or dramatically cut the verdict. But she singled out the champagne comment as she questioned whether Wisner’s impassioned rhetoric crossed a line. Wisner also told jurors their decision could “change the world” and they could become a “part of history.” Bolanos said the comments may prove “sufficiently prejudicial” to warrant a new trial.

The judge reminded Wisner, who joined the hearing by telephone, that she took him aside during the trial’s closing arguments and warned him about his champagne comments. “In front of the jury you disregarded my order, and again repeated the same objectionable statement,” she said.

Bolanos was incredulous when Wisner seemed to suggest that he wasn’t aware of the objection to the champagne reference in particular.

“We believe there was more than adequate evidence provided to this attentive, highly educated jury supporting each of their findings,” Baum Hedlund Aristei & Goldman PC, Wisner’s law firm, said in a statement. “It will be up to the court of appeals to review the evidence and this unanimous jury’s findings in a light most favorable to Lee Johnson.”

[wow_happens28]

Roundup case not over

Reduced $78M Monsanto Verdict Accepted, Setting Stage For Appeal

https://www.ecowatch.com/monsanto-cancer-lawsuit-2617128096.html

Snippet:
"The court's decision to reduce the punitive damage award by more than $200 million is a step in the right direction," Bayer told AFP inquiry at the time of the judge's ruling.

"But we continue to believe that the liability verdict and damage awards are not supported by the evidence at trial or the law and plan to file an appeal with the California Court of Appeal."

Johnson's lawyers said they expected the company to fight back.

"We expect Monsanto to appeal, notwithstanding, so we will address all issues regarding the verdict and the amount of damages at the Court of Appeals," they stated.