Replies to post #18118 on Ehouse Global Inc (EHOS)

[Major Profits]

Do .0001s ALWAYS mean a ticker is a scam and, if so, will STAY a scam even if the CEO changes? (They gotta start somewhere). Frankly, I got in here @.0003 and out quickly (after they changed from "the multi-billion dollar thoroughbred horse racing industry." I actually thought that was legit. Yes really.

https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/12/05/1229232/0/en/EHOUSE-GLOBAL-INC-ANNOUNCES-NEW-STRATEGY-AND-APPOINTMENT-OF-NEW-CEO-AND-OTHER-MANAGEMENT-CHANGES.html

I also happen to believe there MIGHT be some LEGIT Pennyland companies and some CEOs who tell the truth more often than not.

One thing I will look out for is Paul Strickland though. Seems to be the kiss of death everywhere he goes. :-(

GLTY

P.S. Frankly, I RARELY pick .0001s. More often, .0003, .0004 or so. And THEN they go to .0001. :-( (But occasionally they go up which is always great.:-))

P.P.S. That chart I posted was from a, imo, CONpany (selling shares is their real MO) but thought it was legit. Sold vodka. Had the product in Costco (I know, I photographed it). But, alas, another P&D. :-( But, as Timothy Sykes said: "most penny stocks are scams that are created to enrich insiders.” He didn't say ALL were.