InvestorsHub Logo

Pablosrv

09/11/18 4:54 PM

#189091 RE: exwannabe #189089

Conclusions?

flipper44

09/11/18 4:58 PM

#189092 RE: exwannabe #189089

And for the uninitiated, your numbers are on blended data. Thanks for your efforts as well. I am certain it was tedious.

sentiment_stocks

09/11/18 5:46 PM

#189097 RE: exwannabe #189089

199 was just a pair of mislabeled points and all the rest were correct. You had 196,198,199,199.



Oh that makes sense. There is still one more event on the unmethylated chart because I missed one right at the beginning on the initial one you had looked at. So I had to go through all the numbers and renumber them ahead by one - which is why in the end, there are 116 OS event under unmethylated.

But it sounds like your K/M calculation showed it as almost exact anyway.

I also am pretty sure about the one missing censor that I numbered 46 (roughly at 18 months) on the last chart. There are no corresponding censors on either the methylated or unmethylated charts in that spot.

LOL... I think my numbers ended up being dead on because even though I'd forgotten a number here or there initially, it was made up eventually by other sharp eyes here on i-hub (flipper, lykiri) locating additional censors. I think that my most recent chart is probably dead-on, thanks to their help. Considering that I have to copy and paste every number on there, it's inevitable that I will make errors. And I'm sorry that others had to work so hard to find the errors. Still... I'd like to think we worked together as a team and that I am forgiven for my initial errors. :)

Leprecon7777

09/13/18 6:09 PM

#189360 RE: exwannabe #189089

Ex, Would you mind sharing the raw data you used for the KM calculations? A csv or excel file would be very helpful. TIA