I couldn't follow most of that and I have an aversion to spending time reading footnoted tables that are missing their footnotes but I did think this called for a response even if you didn't "expect any answers":
"As I see it THAT agreement makes named milestones material events, if they weren't before"
I won't repeat the lengthy explanation that I provided within the last few days but there basically is no legal definition of "material event" that would apply here.
Maybe I should also disabuse you of this idea:
"Or did Aspire put limits on the 'normal' share selling during Q1 2018 and knowingly forced (too strong expression?) IPIX into future scrambles? And if Aspire did, how?"
Aspire couldn't change the existing agreement without IPIX signing off on the change and filing an amendment to the agreement or terminating it, which would also require a filing.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
