Replies to post #22456 on WindStream Technologies Inc. (fka WSTI)

[Smilin_B]

Rofl ok

Yes, I've been trading full time since 1995 and I need to go over basic Securities Law?

My question pertaining to a statement by another post indicating that investors would be interested in investing. My question was, investing in What entity? ImpactPPA ( from an obvious standpoint of cash infusion). I was not referencing Windstream Technologies. I was merely asking if his statement concerning interested investors, concerned our stock WSTI.

I'm very well aware of what a CEO can and cannot say. But for you to try and tell me that there are not other publicly traded, dark and defunked companies out there whose CEO's are making statements on Twitter and issuing press releases, is a bit far-fetched.

Dan is refraining from making public statements concerning Windstream Technologies because his legal counsel has advised him to do so.

So we are all waiting for some attorney letter. So is this attorney letter going to discuss Windstream Technologies and answer some of the questions we have all been asking? And if so, what makes it legal for an attorney to address questions but a CEO cannot?

[Smilin_B]

By the way, the SEC could care less about dark & defunct, Non reporting WSTI.

Dan is going about things the correct way. He's not trying to pump the stock by issuing any type of fluff press release. He's asking us to simply be patient while he sorts out the legal issues involving WSTI.

[Frankp]

Making ,as you stated, a sizable investment without doing your homework first may have been your first mistake. I think most here did their DD first. Attempting to do it after you made the investment seems foolhardy.