Replies to post #47081 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[Harry Winston]

One TINY positive fact would be welcome here!

It's not positive for the GERS shareholders, but you should read the May 25th Agreement between Greenshift and Attis. The agreement is found in the July 25th entry on Skunk's blog.

Since you asked for facts, this is Paragraph 2.1 of that agreement, copied and pasted verbatim.

On and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Transaction Documents, at the Closing and at all relevant times thereafter, Buyer and Attis shall, on a joint and several basis, pay the Purchase Price to Seller and/or Seller’s Permitted Designee in exchange for the sale, assignment, transfer, and delivery of the Purchased Equity to Buyer and/or Buyer’s Permitted Designee in accordance with the terms of Schedule 2.0 hereto. As used herein, the term “Acquisition” shall mean and refer to the purchase of the Purchased Equity in exchange for payment of the Purchase Price.

Attis is named in the agreement as the buyer of items that are specified as "documents, instruments, agreements and other materials itemized in Schedule 2.3".

As I said earlier, there is a good reason to believe that Attis now owns the patents that were issued to Greenshift by the U.S. Patent Office. They could be included in the documents that are in Schedule 2.3.

Because there is a reason to believe that Greenshift doesn't own their patents any more, it is vital that Kevin be forced to send accurate 10-Ks, 10-Qs, and 8-Ks to the SEC as soon as possible so that the GERS shareholders and the rest of the investing public can see the facts and make truly intelligent investment decisions that are based on facts, not speculation. Any failure to file these reports must result in a punishment by the SEC. The 10-K for 2016 is almost two years late.

You should see the research I do on another medium.