InvestorsHub Logo

plutoniumimplosion

08/08/18 9:50 AM

#46536 RE: rawman #46535

So the investors are supposed to feel "sympathy" for CONSULTANT CEO Seth Shaw, because he invested in TAUG, even though Shaw has NO CLUE about actually running a company!

Amen.

But but but Seth Shaw has his paid consultant to help him.

$20 million, you betcha

Trial will be in Florida

The Pfizer guy has a merger partner already lined up

Seth Shaw has a never ending Rolodex of potential business partners


Nonetheless, TAUG has no products, no employees, no management team, no revenue stream, no office phone number, in fact no real office. It was exactly the same in April 2016 when the Cowan lawsuit became TAUG's only business. Seth Shaw did well with that settlement. But other than trading some stocks, what progress has been made in the last 28 months?

Johnny_C

08/08/18 10:09 AM

#46537 RE: rawman #46535

I think the CEO investment helped keep TAUG afloat. Look, of investments don’t pan out your criticisms would have been correct. If they work out and give Seth better M&A opportunities your criticisms will be wrong.

I think it is to early to rate these moves, and I think they will work out fine.