Thanks for that. I sort of get it. Wouldn’t it be great to see the 27-28 few go off the charts?
It wouldn’t surprise me if they are looking for the milder types to show gains in all categories rather quickly which, some noted, has occurred. And somewhere I recall reading about some normal rats that got even smarter after taking…maybe it was 3-71. In any case if it does get approved we shouldn’t be giving any to the rats.
I do see what you’re getting at and have no doubt you will keep an eye on that for us. haha
Doc, you mentioned A3-71. I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on it. I know that it's a few years behind 2-73, but sounds like a very promising big brother of 2-73 in some pre- clinical studies. Thanks