Replies to post #153941 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[CIMA7]

I read half of this nonsense and I have to tell you I've done my due diligence. I've been to every shareholders meeting I understand the material and its value. Do you understand that one shot of LM 105 used to cost $100? Now one shot of LM 105 is about $10 to $15 and that was per Tom Steipp, which who knows if we can believe that, right?

[iateclube]

Excellent point, it is just as much the refined manufacturing process as it is the the new material that defines the disruptive technology....'final cost to finish the final product'. This has been true for a very long time (certainly in respect to LQMT shareholders). But the penetrating question remains, why is this such a long term failure to financially to perform? 22 cents in August 2018? Is it the material supply, the IP, the BMG, the manufacturing process, cost of machinery, the so called management, lack of any significant contracts, the fact that a US company did not want to buy it, Apple has strangled it, on and on. Many insiders have become richer along the way, but not retail long term shareholders (who cares about the self proclaimed penny day traders getting rich). To repeat this again,Li controls the can of worms which he only understands and will not divulge. But unless he has already cut the deals with the major buyers and has the waivers resolved, 2018 in my view is a....actually yet another a...dump.