InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jckrdu

08/01/18 3:39 PM

#76755 RE: ignatiusrielly35 #76751

Ig - Look at it this way: Just because any company starts a clinical trial, that doesn't legally require them to finish it. Any number of things can and do change during the many years a clinical trial is active.

If ADXS doesn't want to finish the trial, I believe there will be a way out. How partners like Stendhal are handled would be defined in the ADXS-Stendhal agreement. There's probably an old SEC filing that speaks to the situation you're discussing.
icon url

jap1511

08/01/18 8:48 PM

#76776 RE: ignatiusrielly35 #76751

I work on buy-side contracts and I haven't a clue on what be standard terms for a bio partnership agreement. I'd have to think those that represented adxs in the negotiations contemplated an out for either convenience or cause with a possible penalty or some other agreed upon solution. It's way too risky to go into an agreement without an exit clause for them.