InvestorsHub Logo

bcomaha

07/26/18 2:00 AM

#39754 RE: rubberworm #39752

That article reads like the strategy in a multi-person cage match. Try to take down your most severe threat while your have the strength.

Don't forget to read the fine print.

Hallgarten & Company has acted in the past as a strategic consultant to Scandium International and as such was
compensated for those services, but does not hold any stock in the company, nor has the right to hold any stock in
the future.
© 2018 Hallgarten & Company Ltd. All rights reserved.

tedro84

07/26/18 11:12 AM

#39769 RE: rubberworm #39752

The article discards Niocorp based solely on the premise that CBMM will not allow another market niobium participant.

Most reports, including SRK's analysis in the FS, indicate that CBMM welcomes other participants to reduce political risk to niobium and increase usage. Also, CBMM is in the process of an expansion that could increase their production by 50,000 tpa. Niocorps projected 8,000 tpa would have minimal effect on CBMM's global market share but should provide a tad more security to the market. CBMM should easily still supply over 80% of the market.

This doesn't even consider the political climate in the US that at this point appears to see domestic supply for these critical materials not just appealing, but necessary.

I have serious concerns about Niocorps scandium projections. Outside of the capex, I have very few concerns about the niobium source.