InvestorsHub Logo

Au41830

07/26/18 11:38 AM

#39770 RE: tedro84 #39769

<<This doesn't even consider the political climate in the US that at this point appears to see domestic supply for these critical materials not just appealing, but necessary.>>

Couldn’t have said it better myself.

This mine will be built.

walterc

07/26/18 12:07 PM

#39772 RE: tedro84 #39769

Tedro

Your comment about the article in respect of Niobium is correct. It is very poor dd by the author.

About the Scandium , my opinion is that the NioCorp figures will be better then the FS figures as a result of their strategy on Scandium. ( independantly of which scandium price they will use)
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. But I think we will have appetizers before.
I have my ideas about the other scandium plays but this is not the right forum; I am an investor in NioCorp; Not in the other ones.


rubberworm

07/27/18 9:30 PM

#39846 RE: tedro84 #39769

You say "Niocorps projected 8,000 tpa would have minimal effect on CBMM's global market " Correct I would think. Go back and read Pea 1 and Pea 2 . Why a Pea 2. Who is your popi?