Replies to post #46952 on Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[twaflyer1]

Harry... Can you present the GERS complaint exactly how you wrote It? It would be interesting to see?

[Harry Winston]

The SEC doesn't publish complaint forms unless they're willing to read what someone tells them and take action on any valid complaint.

Since no one knows what I told the SEC, no one has a reason to think that I didn't give them a valid complaint.

If the SEC hasn't taken any visible action against the Greenshift Corporation and Kevin personally, as of today, they could still be asking Kevin questions and waiting for his answers. He hasn't filed the reports, so why would he tell us about official inquiries by the SEC? If a CEO is going to be irresponsible once, he might as well be consistently irresponsible.

.. until he's sentenced for breaking the laws that are enforced by the SEC, of course.

[Harry Winston]

This second complaint will probably give us the traction that the first predictably futile complaint failed to deliver.

You're making an assumption that you don't need to make. The assumption is that I'm the only person who has filed a complaint against the Greenshift Corporation.

I think the basis for your assumption is the fact that I'm the only person who has publicly stated that he filed a complaint against the company. That doesn't mean that no one else has filed a complaint.

Multiple complaints from multiple stockholders could very well give the SEC a reason to investigate this company. When they do, as I've stated many times in the past, it will be easy to verify the fact that a half-dozen 10-Q reports are overdue since the third quarter of 2016. The 2016 and 2017 10-K reports are also overdue. It's hard to guess how many 8-K reports should've been filed by Greenshift in the past year and a half (almost two years now), but those are also overdue. Each one of these overdue reports can be a separate count in a criminal indictment of Kevin, whether he's sober on the day it arrives or not.