InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bkshadow

07/23/18 5:03 PM

#528135 RE: hotmeat #528131

HM, the "Change in Control" is regarding the trigger...

...to keep their (post employment via change of control of the employer(s)) claims as represented in the litigation.

...i.e., at core, was the seizure a "Change in Control" as per their Employment Agreements and Contracts (as they claim).

...such Change in Control has ZIP to do with NOLs and IRC 382 as has been theorized; that's re: 5% holders and the 50% of value change (well protected by WMIH stock restrictions and the merger agreement).

...comments in RED.



hotmeat Monday, 07/23/18 04:44:29 PM
Re: bkshadow post# 528123 0
Post #
528131
of 528133
Why the need for a "change in control" hearing in Feb 2019 re the Employee claims issue if this is an already settled issue? Is it that the employees are attempting to show this CIC clause was triggered or that it did not or has not yet happened.

...the issue has run against the FDIC golden parachute preclusion argument; but the change of control issue still open with DE BK. IMO, way, way too long open. And, IMO, ZIP to do with such employees 'having secrets as per earlier recovery theories.

Re the other issue...I welcome any such attempt. It will be dealt with accordingly!!!

...just keep the guard up. GLTY.