InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Stock_Barber

07/14/18 10:46 PM

#158090 RE: 2timer #158089

"Massive overseas naked short position is held "

Really?

By whom?

And why?

If it is truly MASSIVE, they must know something, no?

If true, that should be VERY concerning...


icon url

LOVE*PINK

07/14/18 11:23 PM

#158091 RE: 2timer #158089

CURRENT ALJ NOT AFFECTED by SCOTUS and Trump-Executive*Order

The order does not affect the employment status of current ALJs, Sherk said, although agencies might want to protect themselves against challenges by having the agency head certify their appointment. The order further does not alter disciplinary or other employment policies for ALJs and “is not going to affect ALJs’ decisional independence once they are appointed,” he said.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2018/07/10/trump-moves-to-shield-administrative-law-judge-decisions-in-wake-of-high-court-ruling/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4638dd7a3c28

After their hiring, administrative law judges will still be protected by statutory procedures governing removals, principles that protect independence, Sherk said. He also said the order does not affect the status of current ALJs, though agency chiefs can ratify existing judges to reduce litigation risk stemming from a June Supreme Court decision, Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission.

http://www.abajournal.com/news/article/trump_tosses_hiring_process_for_administrative_law_judges_gives_agency_chie

So, it might happen that Judge Patil will continue this case, as per above DD. We find out in next 7 days.

Very exciting times coming for DBMM Shareholders.

$DBMM