Upon the successful filing of this Form 10-12G, we will be subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. As a result, shareholders will have access to the information required to be reported by publicly held companies under the Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder. We intend to provide our shareholders with quarterly unaudited reports and annual reports containing financial information prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles audited by independent certified public accountants and intend to register under the Securities Exchange Act, Section12(g). There can be no assurance that we shall be able to file this Form 10–12G successfully or that we shall become a reporting company.
One thing I would like to see George do is provide more clarification on exactly what his involvement with EMPM entails. For example, I would be curious to know if Sharp/EMPM have some sort of "official" agreement in place, whether EMPM is relying primarily or exclusively on Sharp to find and/or approve a RM candidate, and the nature/amount of any finder's fee that Sharp will receive.
EAD Law Group is EMPM's registered agent on its Nevada reinstatement filing (and perhaps EMPM's security counsel?). Ever since the EMPM reinstatement appeared (and before Sharp mentioned he had offered his services to the company), I have been assuming/guessing that EAD Law would be heavily involved in suggesting/picking a RM target for the EMPM shell. I figured the most likely RM target would probably be one of the many private companies that EAD Law Group has registered in Nevada during the last couple of years.
Some of those companies may go public through a direct registration process, but many will probably be future reverse merger candidates......