InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

banchrima

10/22/06 3:30 PM

#127684 RE: jjtruthmatters #127680

Board-mascot here again - missed you - welcome! LOL
icon url

GeorgeTJohnson

10/22/06 3:58 PM

#127735 RE: jjtruthmatters #127680

jjtruth - no way

contracts that are completely closed, especially $350 million per year contracts are not lost just like that.

if there is no SLJB $350 million per year contract as of today, then there is only one answer:

the PR was never true and the deal was never closed.
icon url

syracuseo

10/22/06 4:32 PM

#127811 RE: jjtruthmatters #127680

You say potato and I say potahto .....

Beg to differ....but Petar did not say " bluntly, the deal was lost " .

You can read Petar's blog in 2 entirely credible ways.

"Party" has valid point that the contract was a signed deal.....phone calls ( even if incessant ) is not valid reason to void a signed deal, especially a $350 million one, IMO.

You just don't go breaking those kind of HUGE deals for minor reasons.

Why are you so sure to quickly believe the negative ?

I would still prefer to err on the side of optimism, until proven otherwise .

IMO, it is not proven that the deal was lost.